Pa said it's impolite to talk politics
The Sideshow
Posted in: Off Topic
I'd like to go a day without hearing the name Trayvon or Zimmerman...
it's annoying how hyped this case is.
it's annoying how hyped this case is.
"We're slaves to gizmos and toys." - George Carlin
My WTB list:
http://www.circusposterus.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=2229
My WTB list:
http://www.circusposterus.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=2229
jaysea420 wrote:
I'd like to go a day without hearing the name Trayvon or Zimmerman...
it's annoying how hyped this case is.
it's annoying how hyped this case is.
Trayvon's family and friends disagree.
dinkycow wrote:
jaysea420 wrote:
I'd like to go a day without hearing the name Trayvon or Zimmerman...
it's annoying how hyped this case is.
it's annoying how hyped this case is.
Trayvon's family and friends disagree.
probably... but they're not me.
"We're slaves to gizmos and toys." - George Carlin
My WTB list:
http://www.circusposterus.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=2229
My WTB list:
http://www.circusposterus.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=2229
A new study from the University of Arkansas links "low effort thought" with political conservatism.
And part of the study showed that political viewpoints of bar patrons with high blood alcohol levels tended to be more conservative than those of bar patrons with low blood alcohol levels. But it turns out the alcohol itself is not the cause.
The researchers concluded that "low-effort thought, which takes over as people's blood-alcohol level increases" also takes over "when they're forced to quickly process information," and it "boosted their penchant for politically conservative views." According to the study, increased "cognitive load" made people more conservative, "implying our brains can only handle so much before they eschew liberal ideologies."
What I take away from the study is this: Those with a tendency to become overloaded with information quicker than the average person are more likely to have politically conservative viewpoints than the average person. And the more confused (cognitively overloaded) a person becomes, the more likely they are to adopt politically conservative viewpoints.
Link to article: http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/322787
.
And part of the study showed that political viewpoints of bar patrons with high blood alcohol levels tended to be more conservative than those of bar patrons with low blood alcohol levels. But it turns out the alcohol itself is not the cause.
The researchers concluded that "low-effort thought, which takes over as people's blood-alcohol level increases" also takes over "when they're forced to quickly process information," and it "boosted their penchant for politically conservative views." According to the study, increased "cognitive load" made people more conservative, "implying our brains can only handle so much before they eschew liberal ideologies."
What I take away from the study is this: Those with a tendency to become overloaded with information quicker than the average person are more likely to have politically conservative viewpoints than the average person. And the more confused (cognitively overloaded) a person becomes, the more likely they are to adopt politically conservative viewpoints.
Link to article: http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/322787
.

Sat Apr 14, 2012 7:47 am Last edited by leroidecoeur on Sat Apr 14, 2012 8:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
jaysea420 wrote:
dinkycow wrote:
jaysea420 wrote:
I'd like to go a day without hearing the name Trayvon or Zimmerman...
it's annoying how hyped this case is.
it's annoying how hyped this case is.
Trayvon's family and friends disagree.
probably... but they're not me.

I suppose you'd only be outraged had a tea party member been shot by a liberal.
dinkycow wrote:
jaysea420 wrote:
dinkycow wrote:
jaysea420 wrote:
I'd like to go a day without hearing the name Trayvon or Zimmerman...
it's annoying how hyped this case is.
it's annoying how hyped this case is.
Trayvon's family and friends disagree.
probably... but they're not me.

I suppose you'd only be outraged had a tea party member been shot by a liberal.
Don't they have a season for that?
Toy Collection and other crap on Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/thotfulspot/
jaysea420 wrote:
dinkycow wrote:
jaysea420 wrote:
I'd like to go a day without hearing the name Trayvon or Zimmerman...
it's annoying how hyped this case is.
it's annoying how hyped this case is.
Trayvon's family and friends disagree.
probably... but they're not me.
Wow.
dinkycow wrote:
jaysea420 wrote:
dinkycow wrote:
jaysea420 wrote:
I'd like to go a day without hearing the name Trayvon or Zimmerman...
it's annoying how hyped this case is.
it's annoying how hyped this case is.
Trayvon's family and friends disagree.
probably... but they're not me.

I suppose you're only be outraged had a tea party member been shot by a liberal.
IDK. Would depend on the circumstances around it. I know when that liberal shot a bunch of other liberals in Tucson I was pretty outraged...
The problem I have with the Trayvon/Zimmerman thing is that nobody knows yet what actually happened and everyone wants to cast judgement on it. Maybe it was self-defense and maybe it was not, but I think everyone should let the legal system deal with it. We don't need to talk/hear about it every day. We don't need liberal news networks to splice audio to make things sound like something they're not. We don't need the news networks picking photos that help form prejudgements. We don't need people acting like fools because of it.
Maybe I sound callus about it, but every year, if not ever couple months, news networks get ahold of some court case, or legal battle, or criminal incident and hype it up for months and months and months. There's no difference between what they do with this case and any other that they do it to.
"We're slaves to gizmos and toys." - George Carlin
My WTB list:
http://www.circusposterus.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=2229
My WTB list:
http://www.circusposterus.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=2229
leroidecoeur wrote:
A new study from the University of Arkansas links "low effort thought" with political conservatism.
And part of the study showed that political viewpoints of bar patrons with high blood alcohol levels tended to be more conservative than those of bar patrons with low blood alcohol levels. But it turns out the alcohol itself is not the cause.
The researchers concluded that "low-effort thought, which takes over as people's blood-alcohol level increases" also takes over "when they're forced to quickly process information," and it "boosted their penchant for politically conservative views." According to the study, increased "cognitive load" made people more conservative, "implying our brains can only handle so much before they eschew liberal ideologies."
What I take away from the study is this: Those with a tendency to become overloaded with information quicker than the average person are more likely to have politically conservative viewpoints than the average person. And the more confused (cognitively overloaded) a person becomes, the more likely they are to adopt politically conservative viewpoints.
Link to article: http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/322787
.
And part of the study showed that political viewpoints of bar patrons with high blood alcohol levels tended to be more conservative than those of bar patrons with low blood alcohol levels. But it turns out the alcohol itself is not the cause.
The researchers concluded that "low-effort thought, which takes over as people's blood-alcohol level increases" also takes over "when they're forced to quickly process information," and it "boosted their penchant for politically conservative views." According to the study, increased "cognitive load" made people more conservative, "implying our brains can only handle so much before they eschew liberal ideologies."
What I take away from the study is this: Those with a tendency to become overloaded with information quicker than the average person are more likely to have politically conservative viewpoints than the average person. And the more confused (cognitively overloaded) a person becomes, the more likely they are to adopt politically conservative viewpoints.
Link to article: http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/322787
.
"We're slaves to gizmos and toys." - George Carlin
My WTB list:
http://www.circusposterus.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=2229
My WTB list:
http://www.circusposterus.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=2229
People should be talking about it and there should be a dialogue.
Selfdefense does not apply when-
you're in your car FOLLOWING someone.
When the 911 operator tells you to LEAVE that the police are on their way.
When you decide to get out of your car with a GUN.
If he was in danger he was in a CAR all he had to do was drive AWAY and then he wouldn't be in danger.
stop watching Fox news.
Selfdefense does not apply when-
you're in your car FOLLOWING someone.
When the 911 operator tells you to LEAVE that the police are on their way.
When you decide to get out of your car with a GUN.
If he was in danger he was in a CAR all he had to do was drive AWAY and then he wouldn't be in danger.
stop watching Fox news.
Typical Saturday night during summer in Chicago is 3-4 deaths from shooting. It started early this year. Last weekend was 12 or 13 shot and 3 deaths. More Chicago school age kids were killed a week than Iraq. They spent billions in Iraq and they are closing police stations here in Chicago. The money spent in one day in Iraq was more than the yearly budget for police in Chicago.
So what's the Tea Party going to do about that?
So what's the Tea Party going to do about that?
Toy Collection and other crap on Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/thotfulspot/
dinkycow wrote:
People should be talking about it and there should be a dialogue.
Selfdefense does not apply when-
you're in your car FOLLOWING someone.
When the 911 operator tells you to LEAVE that the police are on their way.
When you decide to get out of your car with a GUN.
If he was in danger he was in a CAR all he had to do was drive AWAY and then he wouldn't be in danger.
stop watching Fox news.
Selfdefense does not apply when-
you're in your car FOLLOWING someone.
When the 911 operator tells you to LEAVE that the police are on their way.
When you decide to get out of your car with a GUN.
If he was in danger he was in a CAR all he had to do was drive AWAY and then he wouldn't be in danger.
stop watching Fox news.
Really? A FOX news jab? seriously? Maybe I should watch NBC/MSNBC who edited the 911 calls to make the guy sound like a racist, or maybe watch CNN-- ya know, the station with "Black in America"...
Were you there? Do you know what happened?
All I know is following someone is not necessarily a provocation. If you're advised not to follow and still do it may weaken a self-defense claim, but does not dismiss that defense altogether. Carrying a gun when you're legally able and allowed to doesn't dismiss a self-defense claim either.
And a dialogue about what exactly? What should people be talking about? All the facts of the case aren't even known yet.
"We're slaves to gizmos and toys." - George Carlin
My WTB list:
http://www.circusposterus.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=2229
My WTB list:
http://www.circusposterus.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=2229
Thotfulspot wrote:
Typical Saturday night during summer in Chicago is 3-4 deaths from shooting. It started early this year. Last weekend was 12 or 13 shot and 3 deaths. More Chicago school age kids were killed a week than Iraq. They spent billions in Iraq and they are closing police stations here in Chicago. The money spent in one day in Iraq was more than the yearly budget for police in Chicago.
So what's Occupy Wall St. going to do about that?
So what's Occupy Wall St. going to do about that?
Fixed it for ya
"We're slaves to gizmos and toys." - George Carlin
My WTB list:
http://www.circusposterus.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=2229
My WTB list:
http://www.circusposterus.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=2229
jaysea420 wrote:
All I know is following someone is not necessarily a provocation. If you're advised not to follow and still do it may weaken a self-defense claim, but does not dismiss that defense altogether. Carrying a gun when you're legally able and allowed to doesn't dismiss a self-defense claim either.
Following someone is wrong, whether it is legal or not
Carrying a gun is wrong, whether it is legal or not
Well we've been a good few hours drinking
So I'm going to say what everyone's thinking
If we're stuck on this ship and it's sinking
Then we might as well have a parade
So I'm going to say what everyone's thinking
If we're stuck on this ship and it's sinking
Then we might as well have a parade
Sat Apr 14, 2012 1:28 pm Last edited by theboywil on Sat Apr 14, 2012 1:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The Sideshow
Posted in: Off Topic
Topic tools: ← Previous topic • Next topic →
